The Cobalt.io alternative with compliance mapping built in
Cobalt pioneered pentest-as-a-service with a human tester marketplace. Matproof delivers AI-driven continuous pentesting with compliance-framework mapping at a fraction of the per-engagement cost — and your first report ships in hours, not weeks.
The key difference
Cobalt's model is human pentesters on-demand via their platform. Matproof's model is AI-driven continuous scanning that runs every deploy. For teams shipping code weekly, AI continuous testing delivers better signal than quarterly human engagements.
When teams switch: Teams switch from Cobalt when they want higher testing frequency (continuous vs 1–2 engagements per year), when compliance-framework mapping is a primary need, or when per-engagement pricing is no longer sustainable at their code velocity.
Matproof vs Cobalt.io — feature comparison
| Feature | Matproof | Cobalt |
|---|---|---|
| Testing model | Continuous AI (every deploy) | Human pentesters on-demand |
| Time to first report | Hours | 1–2 weeks |
| Testing frequency | Continuous / weekly / monthly | Per-engagement (quarterly typical) |
| Retest workflow | Automatic on every scan | Manual request + wait |
| Compliance framework mapping | Native — DORA, NIS2, ISO 27001, SOC 2, TISAX, PCI DSS | Reports only, no mapping |
| SAST / source code | Yes — 40+ languages | No |
| Proof of exploit | Every finding validated | Yes (human-verified) |
| Pricing | €299/month add-on | Per-engagement (typically $10–30K) |
| Integration depth | GitHub / GitLab / Jira / Linear / Slack / ADO | Jira / Slack / GitHub |
| Data residency | EU (Frankfurt) | US-primary |
Where Matproof wins
- Continuous testing on every code change (not quarterly)
- First report in hours, not weeks of scheduling
- SAST + DAST + API + infra in a single platform
- Native compliance framework mapping
- EU-only data handling for DORA and GDPR
- 10–20× cost reduction at typical engagement volumes
Where Cobalt wins
- Human pentester expertise for complex business logic
- Established PTaaS brand with enterprise reference customers
- Human narrative in reports some auditors prefer
- Large marketplace of specialised testers
Teams shipping code weekly, EU-regulated entities, compliance-led teams, mid-market SaaS
Teams needing specialised human pentesters for bespoke targets (hardware, IoT, unusual tech stacks)
FAQ — Cobalt.io vs Matproof
Why choose AI pentesting over Cobalt's human testers?
Human testers excel at complex business-logic flaws and novel attack chains. AI pentesting excels at coverage, frequency, and consistency — scanning every endpoint on every deploy. For most SaaS businesses, the critical question is not 'human or AI?' but 'how do we test continuously at a cost we can sustain?' — which AI uniquely solves.
Will my SOC 2 auditor accept an AI-generated pentest report?
Yes. We have customers attested with A-LIGN, Prescient Assurance, Schellman, Deloitte, and KPMG using Matproof as their primary pentest evidence. The report format — CVSS scoring, proof-of-exploit, remediation tracking, control mapping — is what auditors evaluate, not the execution method.
Can I combine AI pentesting with occasional human engagements?
Yes, and many teams do. Matproof runs continuous AI pentesting as the baseline, and teams contract human pentesters (from any provider, including Cobalt) for annual deep-dive engagements on complex targets. Both report formats feed into the same Matproof compliance dashboard.
Evaluate Matproof alongside Cobalt.io
Start a free pentest in minutes. See the report format your auditor will actually read.
Start free pentest