DÉCOUVREZ MATPROOF SUR VOTRE STACK — RÉSERVEZ UNE DÉMO DE 30 MINUTES
All use cases
EU AI ActHR & Recruiting

EU AI Act compliance for HR - from screening to performance reviews.

AI in recruitment, performance monitoring, and worker management is classified as high-risk under the EU AI Act. Emotion recognition in the workplace is banned. Matproof automates compliance across your entire HR tech stack - risk classification, bias testing, human oversight, and fundamental rights impact assessments - so your HR team stays compliant without slowing down hiring.

Matproof for EU AI Act

Your EU AI Act programme, on one screen.

Every AI system discovered, risk-classified and registered — with the technical documentation Annex IV expects.

  • Map controls once, reuse across every framework
  • Evidence collected and time-stamped automatically
  • Audit-ready packages generated on demand
app.matproof.com/eu-ai-actLive

EU AI Act coverage

updated just now
0%Inventory
0%High-risk
0%Tech docs
AI system register · 14 systemsVERIFIED
Risk classification · completeVERIFIED
Annex IV docs · 11/14ON TRACK
DORANIS2ISO 27001SOC 2
Export audit pack →

The Challenge

Why the EU AI Act reshapes HR technology

HR departments have adopted AI faster than almost any other business function - screening, scheduling, performance tracking, and engagement analytics. The EU AI Act classifies most of these tools as high-risk and bans emotion recognition outright. Every company using AI in employment decisions must now comply.

Automated screening is explicitly high-risk

Annex III classifies AI for recruitment and selection - including automated CV screening, candidate ranking, and interview analysis - as high-risk. Every company using AI to filter job applications must comply with the full set of Articles 8-15 requirements, including bias testing, transparency, and human oversight.

Performance monitoring AI requires oversight

AI systems used to monitor and evaluate employee performance, productivity tracking, and behavior analysis in the workplace are high-risk under Annex III. This includes keystroke monitoring, screen recording analysis, communication sentiment analysis, and any AI that influences promotion, termination, or task allocation decisions.

Emotion recognition faces strict limits

Article 5 prohibits emotion recognition in the workplace and educational settings. HR teams using AI tools that analyze facial expressions, voice tone, or body language during interviews or performance reviews must either remove these features or demonstrate they fall outside the prohibition scope - a nuanced legal assessment.

Bias in employment AI has real consequences

Article 10 requires training data that is representative and free from bias. Employment AI trained on historical hiring data often encodes past discrimination. Demonstrating that AI recruitment tools do not discriminate based on gender, ethnicity, age, or disability requires rigorous bias testing and documentation that most HR tech vendors do not yet provide.

Your Compliance Journey

From HR tech audit to full compliance in weeks

1

HR AI Inventory

Catalog all AI systems used in recruitment, performance management, workforce planning, and employee engagement. Matproof classifies each against Annex III employment categories and identifies prohibited uses.

2

Risk & Bias Assessment

For each high-risk system, assess compliance gaps in data governance, bias testing, transparency, and human oversight. Matproof flags prohibited emotion recognition uses and generates bias testing frameworks for recruiting AI.

3

Policy & Documentation

Generate compliant AI usage policies, bias testing reports, human oversight procedures, and transparency documentation. Templates pre-configured for HR use cases - your HR and legal teams review and approve.

4

Ongoing Governance

Monitor AI fairness metrics, track bias testing schedules, maintain documentation for new AI tools, and ensure human oversight is effective. Matproof alerts you when vendor AI tools change or new compliance obligations arise.

Key Requirements

EU AI Act articles that matter most for HR

Art. 6, Annex III(4)

High-Risk Employment AI

  • AI for recruitment and selection of candidates (Annex III, 4(a))
  • AI for making decisions affecting terms of work relationships (Annex III, 4(b))
  • AI for task allocation based on individual behavior or traits
  • AI for monitoring and evaluating employee performance
  • AI for promotion and termination decisions
  • AI-driven workforce planning and restructuring tools
Art. 5, Art. 10

Prohibited Practices & Data Governance

  • Prohibition on workplace emotion recognition systems (Art. 5(1)(f))
  • Training data representativeness across protected groups (Art. 10)
  • Bias examination for gender, ethnicity, age, and disability (Art. 10(2)(f))
  • Documentation of data sources and selection criteria
  • Ongoing data quality monitoring for production systems
  • Assessment of proxy discrimination in alternative data features
Art. 13-14, Art. 26

Transparency & Deployer Obligations

  • Inform candidates that AI is used in recruitment decisions (Art. 13)
  • Human oversight by qualified HR personnel for all decisions (Art. 14)
  • Deployer obligation to conduct fundamental rights impact assessment (Art. 26)
  • Override capability for human reviewers in hiring workflows
  • Works council notification and consultation where applicable
  • Candidate right to explanation of AI-influenced decisions

Why Matproof

Built for HR AI compliance

HR-specific AI risk classification

Matproof classifies your HR tech stack against Annex III employment categories. Recruiting tools, performance systems, workforce analytics - each gets a clear risk determination with the exact compliance requirements that apply.

Bias testing framework for recruiting AI

Structured workflows for documenting adverse impact analysis across protected characteristics. Matproof generates bias testing plans, tracks results, and creates the fairness documentation regulators and works councils expect.

Fundamental rights impact assessment

Article 26 requires deployers of high-risk HR AI to conduct fundamental rights impact assessments. Matproof provides structured templates and guides your HR and legal teams through the assessment process step by step.

Vendor AI compliance tracking

Most HR teams deploy AI through vendor platforms, not custom-built systems. Matproof tracks which vendors provide adequate AI Act documentation and flags gaps in vendor compliance that become your responsibility as a deployer.

Frequently asked questions

Which HR AI systems are high-risk under the EU AI Act?
Annex III, point 4 classifies AI systems in employment, worker management, and access to self-employment as high-risk. This includes AI for CV screening and candidate ranking, automated interview analysis, performance evaluation systems, productivity monitoring, AI-driven promotion or termination decisions, and workforce planning tools. If AI influences any employment decision, it is likely high-risk.
Is emotion recognition completely banned in the workplace?
Article 5(1)(f) prohibits AI systems that infer emotions of employees and candidates in workplace settings, with limited exceptions for medical or safety purposes. This means AI tools analyzing facial expressions during video interviews, voice sentiment in calls, or body language during meetings are prohibited in employment contexts. If your HR tech vendor offers these features, they must be disabled for EU users.
What are the deployer obligations for companies using vendor HR AI tools?
Even if you did not build the AI, Article 26 makes deployers responsible for conducting fundamental rights impact assessments, implementing human oversight measures, informing affected individuals about AI use, and monitoring the AI system during use. You must also verify that your vendor provides adequate technical documentation and has completed their provider-side obligations.
Do works councils need to be involved in AI compliance?
While the EU AI Act does not directly mandate works council involvement, many EU member states have labor laws requiring works council consultation before introducing monitoring or evaluation technologies. Article 26(7) specifically requires deployers to inform worker representatives about high-risk AI systems. Matproof helps document this consultation process as part of your compliance workflow.

Get your HR tech stack compliant before enforcement.

Book a 30-minute demo and see how Matproof classifies your HR AI tools, automates bias testing, and ensures compliant hiring practices under the EU AI Act.

Not ready for a demo?

Let's talk compliance

Leave your email and we will reach out personally to discuss your compliance needs.

We follow up personally within 24 hours. No automated spam.