arXiv: Architectural Bias in Face Presentation Attack Detection: A Comparative Study of Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks

This publication, titled "Architectural Bias in Face Presentation Attack Detection," is a research paper from arXiv that compares the performance of Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks in detecting face spoofing attacks. It reveals that different AI architectures exhibit systematic biases, meaning some models may perform well on certain demographic groups or attack types while failing on others. This is not a regulatory change but a technical finding that has direct implications for AI safety and fairness under the EU AI Act.

The findings affect any organization deploying facial recognition or liveness detection systems, particularly in high-risk sectors such as banking, border control, law enforcement, and access management. These entities must ensure their biometric systems are not only accurate but also free from discriminatory bias across age, gender, and ethnicity. The paper highlights that even state-of-the-art models can have hidden vulnerabilities that undermine both security and compliance.

Compliance teams should immediately review their AI system documentation to confirm that bias testing covers architectural differences between model types. They should require vendors to provide disaggregated performance metrics for presentation attack detection across demographic subgroups. Additionally, teams should update their risk assessments and conformity assessments under the AI Act to account for architectural bias, and consider mandating periodic re-evaluation as new model architectures emerge.