arXiv: Beyond Runtime Enforcement: Shield Synthesis as Defensibility Analysis for Adversarial Networks

This publication introduces a novel technical framework for evaluating the defensibility of AI systems against adversarial manipulation, moving beyond traditional runtime enforcement methods. The paper proposes a formal approach to "shield synthesis," which allows compliance teams to assess whether an AI model's internal architecture can withstand targeted attacks before deployment. While not a regulatory mandate, this work signals a shift in the technical standards community toward proactive, design-stage safety verification rather than reactive monitoring.

The primary audience for this development includes organizations deploying high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act, particularly in sectors like autonomous vehicles, healthcare diagnostics, and critical infrastructure. Compliance teams in these areas should note that regulators and notified bodies may increasingly expect evidence of defensibility analysis during conformity assessments. Financial institutions using AI for fraud detection or credit scoring should also monitor this trend, as adversarial robustness is becoming a key factor in systemic risk evaluations.

Compliance teams should immediately review their current AI safety testing protocols to determine if they include adversarial robustness checks. If not, they should begin evaluating third-party tools or internal capabilities for conducting shield synthesis analysis. It is also prudent to document any existing runtime enforcement measures and map them against the defensibility criteria outlined in this paper. Finally, teams should engage with their technical leads to assess whether upcoming model updates will require pre-deployment defensibility audits to maintain regulatory alignment.