arXiv: Capability and Robustness Cannot Both Be Free: An Information-Theoretic Bound for Vision-Language-Action Models

A new preprint from arXiv, titled "Capability and Robustness Cannot Both Be Free," presents an information-theoretic bound for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, which are AI systems that combine visual perception, language understanding, and physical action. The paper demonstrates a fundamental trade-off: as these models become more capable in complex tasks, their robustness to adversarial inputs or distribution shifts necessarily decreases, and vice versa. This is not a regulatory change per se, but a scientific finding with direct implications for AI safety and compliance under frameworks like the EU AI Act, particularly for high-risk systems that must demonstrate both performance and resilience.

Organizations developing or deploying VLA models in sectors such as autonomous robotics, healthcare, manufacturing, and autonomous vehicles are most affected. Compliance teams in these sectors must reassess their risk management strategies, as the paper suggests that achieving both high capability and high robustness may be mathematically impossible without significant design compromises. This challenges the assumption that models can be simultaneously optimized for accuracy and safety without incurring trade-offs.

Compliance teams should immediately review their model validation protocols to ensure they explicitly measure and document the capability-robustness trade-off for any VLA system in development or deployment. They should also update their technical documentation and risk assessments under Article 9 of the EU AI Act to reflect this inherent limitation, and consider implementing separate performance thresholds for capability and robustness rather than a single combined metric. Engaging with research teams to explore mitigation strategies, such as adversarial training or ensemble methods, is also recommended.