arXiv: Incentives and Market Structure in Intent-Based Exchanges: Evidence from a Solver-Reward Reform

This paper, published on arXiv, analyzes a specific regulatory-style reform within a decentralized exchange system, focusing on how changes to solver rewards in an intent-based trading protocol affected market structure and participant behavior. The study examines the shift from a first-price to a second-price auction mechanism for solvers, who compete to fulfill user trade intents. The key finding is that this reform reduced solver profits and altered their bidding strategies, but did not significantly improve user outcomes or reduce market concentration, raising questions about the effectiveness of such incentive design changes.

The primary audience affected includes developers, operators, and compliance teams working with decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, particularly those using intent-based architectures or auction mechanisms for trade execution. This also impacts any organization involved in designing or auditing automated market makers, order flow auctions, or blockchain-based settlement layers. Regulators monitoring market fairness and competition in digital asset markets should take note, as the findings highlight how technical incentive changes can have unintended consequences on market structure.

Compliance teams should review any internal protocols that use solver or auction-based trade execution to assess whether current incentive structures align with intended user protection and market integrity goals. They should document the economic rationale for their chosen auction design and monitor for signs of solver collusion or excessive concentration. Additionally, teams should prepare to explain to regulators how their system’s incentive mechanisms prevent unfair advantages, using this study as a reference for potential pitfalls in similar reforms.